Fecher, B., & Friesike, S. (2014). Open Science: one term, five schools of thought. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening Science (pp. 17-47). Springer Open. Available at: http://book.openingscience.org/basics_background/open_science_one_term_five_schools_of_thought.html
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). Mode 2 Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Minerva, 41, 179–194.
Open Cultures and Open Innovation
Chesbrough, H. (2015). From Open Science to Open Innovation. Science Business Publishing. Available at: http://sciencebusiness.net/eventsarchive/OpenScience/OpenScience.pdf
Mayer, K. (2015). From Science 2.0 to Open Science: Turning rhetoric into action? STCSN-eLetter, 3(1). Available at: http://stcsn.ieee.net/e-letter/stcsn-e-letter-vol-3-no-1/from-science-2-0-to-open-science
Moedas, C. (2015). Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World. Speech 22 June 2015: Brussels, ‘A new start for Europe: Opening up to an ERA of Innovation’ Conference. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-15-5243_en.htm
Open Access, Open Education and Disruptive Technologies
Herb, U. (2010). Sociological implications of scientific publishing: Open access, science, society, democracy, and the digital divide. First Monday, 15(2). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2599/2404
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of interactive Media in education, 2012(3). Available at: http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2012-18/
Open Research Data and Open Methods
Arzberger, P., Schröder, P., Beaulieu, A., Bowker, G. C., Casey, K., Laaksonen, L., Moorman, D., Uhlir, P., & Wouters, P. (2004). Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic, and Social Development. Data Science Journal, 3, 135-152. Available at: http://www.ics.uci.edu/~gbowker/promoting%20access.pdf
OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding (2007). Available at: http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/38500813.pdf
What is Open Notebook Science: http://onsnetwork.org/what-is-open-notebook-science/
Ethos of Science: Reproducibility and Open Evaluation
Merton, R. K. (1973[1942]). The normative structure of science. In The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267-278). Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press. Available at Google Books
Open Science Collaboration. (2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 657-660.
Available at: http://pps.sagepub.com/content/7/6/657.full.pdf+html
Citizen Science and DIY Expertise
Delfanti, A. (2011). Hacking genomes. The ethics of open and rebel biology. International Review of Information Ethics, 15(09), 52-57. Available at: http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/015/015-Delfanti.pdf
Prainsack, B. (2014). Understanding participation: the ‘citizen science’ of genetics. In B. Prainsack, S. Schicktanz, & G. Werner-Felmayer (Eds.), Genetics as Social Practice (pp. 147-164). Ashgate. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/3552182/Understanding_Participation_The_citizen_science_of_genetics
Opening Social Sciences
Miguel, E., Camerer, C., Casey, K., Cohen, et al. (2014). Promoting transparency in social science research. Science, 343, 30-31. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4103621/
Sidler, M. (2014). Open Science and the Three Cultures: Expanding Open Science to all Domains of Knowledge Creation. In S. Bartling, & S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening Science (pp. 81-85). Springer Open. Available at: http://book.openingscience.org/basics_background/open_science_and_the_three_cultures.html
Optional literature
Hess, Ch., & Ostrom, E. (2006) Introduction: An Overview of the Knowledge Commons. In: Understanding Knowledge as a Commons – From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, Mass.; MIT Press. Available at: http://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/content/9780262083577_sch_0001.pdf
Johns, A. (2006). Intellectual Property and the Nature of Science. Cultural Studies, 20(2-3), 145-164.
Friesike, S., & Schildhauer, T. (2015). Open science: many good resolutions, very few incentives, yet. In I. Welpe, J. Wollersheim, S. Ringelhan, & M. Osterloh (Eds.), Incentives and Performance (pp. 277-289). Springer International Publishing. Available at: http://www.performancemanagement.wi.tum.de/fileadmin/w00bkk/www/Buch/manuscripts/Friesike_Schildhauer.pdf
Worlock, K. (2004). The pros and cons of Open Access. Nature. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/34.html
No comments:
Post a Comment